Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh: The Not-So-Bright-Line

In Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh, referred to in this article as ‘‘Sharp III,’’ the Federal Circuit, for the first time, addressed the interpretation and application of FAR 8.406-6, the 10-year-old Disputes Clause applicable to claims under the Contract Disputes Act of 19782 (CDA) submitted in connection with Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts. The Disputes Clause governs which contracting officer (CO) — the agency who issued a particular contract or the agency who issued
the schedule — has the authority to decide a claim submitted by a contractor, which in turn affects appellate jurisdiction over the claim since a final decision is a prerequisite for any appeal. Download the PDF


Related Resources

Published on:

Funding freezes impact farmers and ranchers

Partner Josh Schnell recently spoke to a large group of farmers, ranchers, and the non-profits that support about their legal rights with respect to suspended and terminated contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements. Click this post to access the webinar and related news coverage. 
Published on:

Can the Trump Administration end California’s high-speed rail project?

Partner Josh Schnell was recently interviewed by Smart Cities Dive on compliance issues related to the California High-Speed Rail Authority's multi-billion dollar grant from the U.S. Department of Department of Transportation. Click on this post to access the article.
Published on:

Client alert: Federal court pauses DEI executive orders

On February 21, 2025, a federal court issued a nation-wide preliminary injunction that temporarily stops President Trump’s efforts to criminalize programs that support diversity, equity, and inclusion. Click the link to learn more and contact Josh Schnell with questions about DEI terminations or related compliance issues.