GAO Upholds Defense Finance and Accounting Service’s Support Award

The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) may proceed with performance of a support services award, the General Accountability Office (GAO) ruled (Savantage Fin. Servs. Inc., GAO, B-411647, 9/17/15, decision released 9/24/15).

The GAO rejected the protester’s challenge to the agency’s non-price-factor evaluations and best-value determination.

The DFAS issued a request for quotations to provide support services for the agency’s Defense Departmental Reporting System.  Quotations were sought from holders of General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contracts under North American Industry Classification System Code 541519 to provide a variety of operational and functional support.

Protester Savantage Financial Services Inc. and awardee CSCI Consulting Inc. received the same rating for non-price factors, but CSCI Consulting won the award after proposing savings of more than $1 million.  Savantage protested the agency’s technical and past performance evaluations.

Reasonable Interpretation.  The GAO denied the protest, concluding that the technical evaluation satisfied solicitation requirements by focusing on the awardee’s proposed labor categories.

The GAO also upheld the past performance evaluation, noting that the agency assessed CSCI Consulting’s recent and relevant experience in terms of size, scope and complexity on at least five prior contracts, including those involving the Defense Departmental Reporting System.

Finally, the GAO upheld the best-value determination because Savantage’s quotation didn’t demonstrate any additional value to warrant a price premium.

Thompson Coburn LLP represented the protester.  Cohen Mohr LLP represented the intervenor-awardee.

The GAO’s decision is available at:  https://www.gao.gov/assets/680/672728.pdf

Reproduced with permission from Federal Contracts Report 104 FCR 991, 9/29/15. Copyright 2015 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) <https://www.bna.com>

Related Resources

Published on:

Client alert: U.S. government cannot implement the overhaul of federal grant regulations through December 11, 2026

Congress has put OMB’s proposed overhaul of federal grant regulations on hold through December 11, 2026. Against the backdrop of an extraordinary public response to the proposed overhaul—496,606 comments received—our latest client alert explains how the proposed overhaul has been delayed by the 2027 Continuing Appropriations Act and what may come next.
Published on:

District court holds that agencies cannot terminate grants based on post-award changes to agency goals and priorities

The District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently held that 2 C.F.R. § 200.340(a)(4) does not authorize grant terminations based on changes to program goals or agency priorities that an agency identifies after issuing a grant. This decision is significant because the administration has relied on 2 C.F.R. § 200.340(a)(4) to terminate billions of dollars in grants based on post-award changes to program goals and priorities. Josh Schnell and Sam Van Kopp represented 13 members of Congress who filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs in the case, who are twenty states, three governors, and the District of Columbia. Click this post to read the decision and our amicus brief.
Published on:

Cordatis prevails in Federal Circuit appeal

Daniel Strouse and Josh Schnell recently obtained a favorable appellate decision in a multi-year, multi-protest saga involving USPS's global contract for bomb-detection services. Of note, the Federal Circuit's decision includes important holdings on timely interventions and the requirements for filing redacted protest pleadings. Click the link to learn more.