Norah Molnar Joins Cohen Mohr

Cohen Mohr LLP is pleased to announce that Norah D. Molnar, a former Dickstein Shapiro LLP partner, has joined the firm’s policyholder-side insurance coverage practice. Ms. Molnar advises and represents policyholders in pursuing and maximizing insurance coverage under a wide variety of policy forms, including directors and officers (D&O), professional errors and omissions (E&O), employment practices liability (EPL), general liability (GL), and fiduciary liability, among others. Ms. Molnar also assists clients with evaluating policy forms and endorsements during the insurance procurement process. Ms. Molnar’s insurance coverage experience includes underlying claims against insureds involving the False Claims Act, consumer protection statutes, securities laws, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, private equity activities, state attorneys general and federal government investigations, trademark and trade dress infringement, patent infringement, false advertising, subprime lending, regulatory violations, wrongful termination, and a variety of business torts. Her clients have included private equity firms and their portfolio companies, lending institutions, career colleges, manufacturers, nonprofit organizations, and a leading global developer of luxury destination properties. Recently, Ms. Molnar was highlighted in the “Insurance: advice to policyholders” section of the 2011 edition of The Legal 500.

Prior to turning her focus exclusively to insurance coverage counseling and litigation, Ms. Molnar advised and represented clients in matters pertaining to federal, state, and local government contracts, including civil False Claims Act lawsuits, bid protests, contract disputes, and Congressional hearings. Ms. Molnar has also represented clients in a variety of commercial litigation and arbitration matters, including securities fraud, accounting fraud, professional negligence, misrepresentation, and breach of contract.

As an insurance coverage lawyer with more than 12 years of government contracts experience, Ms. Molnar is uniquely qualified to assist clients with insurance matters specific to government contractors. As such, there are valuable synergies between Ms. Molnar’s insurance coverage practice and the firm’s other practice areas. As to why she chose Cohen Mohr, Ms. Molnar says, “I began my legal career at Cohen Mohr as a summer associate 17 years ago and have always admired their dedication to quality and client relationships. I feel that Cohen Mohr provides the optimal platform to give me the flexibility to control and grow my practice in a manner most beneficial to my clients.”

Related Resources

Published on:

Client alert: U.S. government cannot implement the overhaul of federal grant regulations through December 11, 2026

Congress has put OMB’s proposed overhaul of federal grant regulations on hold through December 11, 2026. Against the backdrop of an extraordinary public response to the proposed overhaul—496,606 comments received—our latest client alert explains how the proposed overhaul has been delayed by the 2027 Continuing Appropriations Act and what may come next.
Published on:

District court holds that agencies cannot terminate grants based on post-award changes to agency goals and priorities

The District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently held that 2 C.F.R. § 200.340(a)(4) does not authorize grant terminations based on changes to program goals or agency priorities that an agency identifies after issuing a grant. This decision is significant because the administration has relied on 2 C.F.R. § 200.340(a)(4) to terminate billions of dollars in grants based on post-award changes to program goals and priorities. Josh Schnell and Sam Van Kopp represented 13 members of Congress who filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs in the case, who are twenty states, three governors, and the District of Columbia. Click this post to read the decision and our amicus brief.
Published on:

Cordatis prevails in Federal Circuit appeal

Daniel Strouse and Josh Schnell recently obtained a favorable appellate decision in a multi-year, multi-protest saga involving USPS's global contract for bomb-detection services. Of note, the Federal Circuit's decision includes important holdings on timely interventions and the requirements for filing redacted protest pleadings. Click the link to learn more.