Can’t win for losing?

A Cordatis team consisting of Daniel Strouse and Josh Schnell recently persuaded the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to leave their client’s contract in place despite an unfavorable decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Specifically, the Federal Circuit reversed an earlier decision in which the Court of Federal Claims disqualified an earlier awardee based on organizational conflicts of interest. Nevertheless, the Court of Federal of Claims agreed that the mandate rule allowed our client to keep the contract it won as a result of the earlier protest. Click here to read the decision.

Related Resources

Published on:

Another successful protest intervention

A Cordatis team consisting of David Cohen and John O’Brien successfully defended the Department of Veterans Affairs’ decision to award a contract to Deloitte Consulting for enterprise software development services.
Published on:

Jason Moy teaches at the Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center at the University of Virginia

Jason Moy—a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve—recently taught government contract law at the 177th Contract Attorneys Course hosted by the Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center at the University of Virginia.
Published on:

Cordatis prevails in GAO protest alleging an organizational conflict of interest

A Cordatis team consisting of David Cohen and John O'Brien successfully defended Deloitte & Touche's contract award in a bid protest claiming that the Department of Defense failed to investigate and mitigate an alleged organizational conflict of interest.