Client Alert – Know your rights when the government terminates your contract

President Trump’s Terminations for Convenience: Know Your Rights

            Two of President Donald J. Trump’s Executive Orders direct federal agencies to end their Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) programs.[1] As a result, agencies that contracted for DEIA services are now terminating those contracts for the government’s convenience.

            Contractors facing the sudden termination of their contracts must know their rights. For example, Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) 52.249-1, 52.249-2, 52.249-4, 52.249-6, and 52.212-4(l) entitle contractors to recover a wide range of costs arising from terminations. These costs include: (1) labor, material, other-direct-costs, indirect expenses, and profit arising from performance of the contract prior to the contract’s termination; (2) termination-specific costs like severance, unexpired leases, and idle facilities; (3) subcontractor settlement costs approved by the government; and (4) direct costs and General & Administrative (G&A) expenses attributable to the termination settlement process itself. Reasonable legal and accounting costs incurred to prepare a settlement proposal are also recoverable.

             Termination Settlement Proposals are drafted using government-provided standard forms and one of two cost-accounting methods: (1) an Inventory Basis methodology that tracks unit costs at a granular level (the government’s preference); and (2) a Total Cost Basis methodology, which does not break-down costs beyond their cost element––i.e., direct labor, indirect expenses, etc. Do not be misled by the standardized nature of these forms and the limited space they allow for cost explanations and justifications. This is your chance to tell your story, and we can help you draft a compelling narrative with supporting documentation that establishes your entitlement to the costs at issue. In addition, you may be able to recover the attorney fees you incur preparing your Termination Settlement Proposal.

            Termination settlements are a core part of Cordatis LLP’s practice. Over the past four decades, we’ve helped dozens of clients––from small businesses to Fortune 500 companies––recover tens of millions of dollars in termination costs. Please contact Josh Schnell, Daniel Strouse, or Sam Van Kopp for assistance with issues related to the government’s termination of your contract.

[1] Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing (January 21, 2025) and Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (January 20, 2025).

Related Resources

Published on:

Another successful intervention

A Cordatis team consisting of David Cohen, Pablo Nichols, and John O'Brien successfully defended our client Unison Software against a protest from CGI Federal. In its decision, GAO rejected CGI's arguments related to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's assessment of FedRAMP eligibility and evaluation of the proposals.
Published on:

When in doubt – intervene!

John O'Brien recently protected our client's contract in a post-award GAO  protest. In affirming the award, GAO rejected the protestor's arguments about corporate experience.
Published on:

Protest win with attorney fees

A Cordatis team consisting of Laurel Hockey, Daniel Strouse, John O'Brien, and Rhina Cardenal won a protest on behalf of our client ATP Gov, LLC. In its decision, GAO agreed with our argument that the awardee was ineligible because it had proposed portable satellite terminals that did not meet the solicitation's material requirements. Even better, GAO directed NASA to pay our attorney fees.