GAO Protest Decision Information International Associates, Inc.

Agency unreasonably evaluated awardee’s proposal as containing a strength where the added benefit identified by the agency was either not consistent with the terms of the solicitation or not adequately supported by the record, and the agency unreasonably evaluated the protester’s proposal as containing a weakness where the awardee’s proposal was not materially different from the protester’s and only the protester’s proposal was assessed a weakness.

 

Download the PDF


 

Related Resources

Published on:

When in doubt – intervene!

John O'Brien recently protected our client's contract in a post-award GAO  protest. In affirming the award, GAO rejected the protestor's arguments about corporate experience.
Published on:

Another successful protest intervention

A Cordatis team consisting of David Cohen and John O’Brien successfully defended the Department of Veterans Affairs’ decision to award a contract to Deloitte Consulting for enterprise software development services.
Published on:

Can’t win for losing?

A Cordatis team consisting of Daniel Strouse and Josh Schnell recently persuaded the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to leave their client's contract in place despite an unfavorable decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.