Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh: The Not-So-Bright-Line

In Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh, referred to in this article as ‘‘Sharp III,’’ the Federal Circuit, for the first time, addressed the interpretation and application of FAR 8.406-6, the 10-year-old Disputes Clause applicable to claims under the Contract Disputes Act of 19782 (CDA) submitted in connection with Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts. The Disputes Clause governs which contracting officer (CO) — the agency who issued a particular contract or the agency who issued
the schedule — has the authority to decide a claim submitted by a contractor, which in turn affects appellate jurisdiction over the claim since a final decision is a prerequisite for any appeal. Download the PDF


Related Resources

Published on:

Successful GAO Protest Intervention

In a recent GAO protest, a Cordatis team consisting of David Cohen, John O'Brien, and Rhina Cardenal successfully defended our client's task-order contract for telecom services from the Social Security Administration. Click the link to learn more.
Published on:

Cordatis challenges USAID’s termination of the Payne Fellowship Program

A Cordatis team consisting of Josh Schnell and Sam Van Kopp filed a class action complaint challenging USAID's termination of the Payne Fellowship Program. Click the link to read more.
Published on:

Funding freezes impact farmers and ranchers

Partner Josh Schnell recently spoke to a large group of farmers, ranchers, and the non-profits that support them about their legal rights with respect to suspended and terminated contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements. Click this post to access the webinar and related news coverage.