Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh: The Not-So-Bright-Line

In Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh, referred to in this article as ‘‘Sharp III,’’ the Federal Circuit, for the first time, addressed the interpretation and application of FAR 8.406-6, the 10-year-old Disputes Clause applicable to claims under the Contract Disputes Act of 19782 (CDA) submitted in connection with Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts. The Disputes Clause governs which contracting officer (CO) — the agency who issued a particular contract or the agency who issued
the schedule — has the authority to decide a claim submitted by a contractor, which in turn affects appellate jurisdiction over the claim since a final decision is a prerequisite for any appeal. Download the PDF


Related Resources

Published on:

Cordatis files amicus brief on behalf of 13 Members of Congress

Josh Schnell and Sam Van Kopp filed an amicus brief on behalf of 13 Members of Congress (7 Senators and 6 Representatives) in support of the plaintiffs in NJ et al. v. OMB et al. (D. Mass). Plaintiffs are 21 states and the District of Columbia who are challenging the Trump administration’s termination of billions of dollars of grants and other federal financial assistance agreements. Click the link to learn more.
Published on:

“Mystery surrounds $1.2 billion Army contract to build huge detention tent camp in Texas desert”

Partner Josh Schnell was quoted in a recent AP article on the Army's award of a $1.2 billion contract to build and operate an immigration detention facility on Fort Bliss. In the article, Josh discusses some of the bid protest issues related to the contract. Click this post for a link to the article.
Published on:

Successful GAO Protest Intervention

In a recent GAO protest, a Cordatis team consisting of David Cohen, John O'Brien, and Rhina Cardenal successfully defended our client's task-order contract for telecom services from the Social Security Administration. Click the link to learn more.