Big Bid Protest Win at the COFC

The team of Bill Savarino and John O’Brien won a significant decision in favor of NetStar-1 Government Consulting, Inc. at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims involving an Organizational Conflict of Interest (“OCI”). NetStar filed a protest at the GAO alleging that the awardee of a Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) contract had an OCI that afforded them an unequal access to, among other things, NetStar’s proprietary labor rates under NetStar’s incumbent contract. The GAO denied NetStar’s protest, which prompted NetStar to file a protest with U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC No. 11-294C). Judge Allegra granted NetStar’s request for a preliminary injunction pending a decision on the merits on June 13, 2011. After considerable briefing and oral argument, Judge Allegra granted NetStar’s protest and permanently enjoined ICE from awarding the contract to ALON on October 17, 2011. ICE has appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Related Resources

Published on:

Josh Schnell elected to the Board of Governors of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims Bar Association

Partner Josh Schnell was recently elected to the Board of Governors of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC) Bar Association. Since its founding in 1987, the COFC Bar Association has supported the Court and promoted justice in disputes between the United States government and its citizens.
Published on:

AP – “Some Native Americans draw shocked response over contract to design immigration detention centers”

Josh Schnell was interviewed by the Associated Press regarding allegations of waste, fraud, and abuse in 8(a) set-aside contracts. In the article, which focuses on Department of Homeland Security sole-source 8(a) contracts, Josh stressed the importance of competition and transparency in federal contracting. Click the link to read the article in Politico. 
Published on:

Client Advisory: Legal Considerations for Africa’s Next Era of Growth

Seizing opportunities across the African continent and in other international contexts, particularly low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), can feel daunting. This client advisory outlines key legal considerations for structuring cross-border agreements, selecting appropriate entity types, engaging jurisdiction-specific counsel, and building compliance frameworks that support effective, scalable multi-country operations.