This section provides useful news and resources such as links to information and assistance sites for legal matters, articles published by Cohen Mohr attorneys, representative cases, and various policies and procedures relevant to our practice areas.
Resources
Menu
Published on:
STG, Inc., B-408992, Dec. 15, 2013
Successful protest on behalf of STG where agency took corrective action by cancelling the awarded contract and the solicitation.
Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh: The Not-So-Bright-Line
In Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh, referred to in this article as ‘‘Sharp III,’’ the Federal Circuit, for the first time, addressed the interpretation and application of FAR 8.406-6, the 10-year-old Disputes Clause applicable to claims...
East West, Inc. v. United States, No. 11-455C (Fed. Cl. Sep. 27, 2012)
Successful motion in the Court of Federal Claims for a permanent injunction prohibiting the Department of Health and Human Services from excluding East West, Inc. from the competitive range of offerors.
On behalf of Intelligent Decisions, Inc., successfully defended contract award of hardware and logistics support by the United States Marine Corps. The GAO found that the agency’s evaluation conformed to the terms of the solicitation, and in any...
Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United States, — Fed. Cl. —, No. 12-274 C (Aug. 10, 2012)
Successfully defended post-award bid protest challenging Department of Labor's award of firm-fixed price task order issued under General Services Administration (GSA) federal supply schedule (FSS) for commercial-off-the-shelf acquisition management system (AMS) software.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, B-40678, Aug. 3, 2012, 2012 CPD ¶ 227
On behalf of Deloitte & Touche LLP, successfully defended issuance of task order by the Department of Homeland Security. The GAO found that the the agency reasonably found that some of the protester’s key personnel failed...
Successful protest of agency's procurement of bathroom paper products when record reflected that agency's evaluation methodology was inconsistent with the terms of the solicitation.
