Client Alert: Implementing New Foreign Assistance Regulations


On January 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of State published three final rules implementing the Protecting Human Flourishing in Foreign Assistance Policy (“PHFFA Policy”). Effective February 26, 2026, these rules introduce new conduct restrictions, operational requirements, and compliance obligations for organizations receiving U.S. foreign assistance. The rules will be codified in the Uniform Guidance at 2 C.F.R. §200.602, 2 C.F.R. §200.603, and 2 C.F.R. §200.604.

The PHFFA Policy reshapes how foreign assistance implementers seeking and utilizing USG donor assistance must assess funded activities, screen programs, structure operations, and govern relationships with downstream entities. Because these rules impose mandatory flow-down provisions and create potential liability for prime recipients based on the activities of subrecipients, understanding and adapting to this modified compliance landscape is essential.

What the PHFFA Policy Does

The PHFFA Policy introduces three new award provisions that will be included in new awards or added to existing awards when such awards are amended to add new funding:
  • Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance (PLFA): restricts providing or promoting abortion as a method of family planning in foreign assistance-funded activities.
  • Combating Gender Ideology in Foreign Assistance (CGIFA): restricts provision of sex-rejecting procedures and prohibits promotion of defined “gender ideology” in funded programs.
  • Combating Discriminatory Equity Ideology in Foreign Assistance (CDEIFA): restricts unlawful discriminatory equity practices and prohibits promotion of defined “discriminatory equity ideology” in funded programs.
The detailed requirements of the PHFFA Policy will require implementers to adopt a systematic, holistic approach that embeds PHFFA compliance into core operating systems rather than treating it as a stand-alone legal issue. An immediate applicability and separation assessment should occur across that entire organization if it receives U.S.G. foreign assistance at any level.   Assessment of the organization and the specific U.S.G.-funded awards, amendments, proposals, and subawards is a necessary step to determine exposure and prioritize implementation. PHFFA compliance will require extensive efforts across the entire award lifecycle, including proposals; implementation plans; geography of operations; sub-awardee organization-type, due diligence, and governance (including oversight of sub-sub-awardees), and separation plans (as applicable to U.S. NGOs).

How Cordatis Can Help

Cordatis supports organizations adapting to PHFFA through the entire award lifecycle. Examples of the services that Cordatis provides to U.S.G. foreign assistance grantees include:
  • Conducting rapid enterprise-level exposure assessments to identify affected awards, programs, geographic operations, and structural risk areas.
  • Advising on proposal-stage compliance strategies, including reviewing implementation plans for PHFFA risk exposure prior to submission.
  • Designing and implementing core operational controls, including organizational separation analyses for U.S. NGOs, documentation systems, and staff training frameworks.
  • Organization-specific training, including initial implementation sessions, annual refreshers, and onboarding training for new staff.
  • Developing activity-screening frameworks, internal review tools, and approval workflows to reduce inadvertent compliance exposure.
  • Updating subaward templates, incorporating required flow-down provisions, and assisting with subrecipient due diligences, such as designing documented pre-award due diligence processes to reduce prime-recipient liability exposure.
  • Building risk-based monitoring infrastructures, including written monitoring plans, findings logs, corrective action templates, and documentation protocols.
This advisory is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Organizations receiving covered U.S.G. foreign assistance should evaluate their current compliance posture and implement structural controls appropriate to their funding portfolio and operational model. 

Please contact Muriel Moody Korol or Josh Schnell if we can be of assistance.

Related Resources

Published on:

District court holds that agencies cannot terminate grants based on post-award changes to agency goals and priorities

The District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently held that 2 C.F.R. § 200.340(a)(4) does not authorize grant terminations based on changes to program goals or agency priorities that an agency identifies after issuing a grant. This decision is significant because the administration has relied on 2 C.F.R. § 200.340(a)(4) to terminate billions of dollars in grants based on post-award changes to program goals and priorities. Josh Schnell and Sam Van Kopp represented 13 members of Congress who filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs in the case, who are twenty states, three governors, and the District of Columbia. Click this post to read the decision and our amicus brief.
Published on:

Cordatis prevails in Federal Circuit appeal

Daniel Strouse and Josh Schnell recently obtained a favorable appellate decision in a multi-year, multi-protest saga involving USPS's global contract for bomb-detection services. Of note, the Federal Circuit's decision includes important holdings on timely interventions and the requirements for filing redacted protest pleadings. Click the link to learn more. 
Published on:

Spotlight PA – “The Trump admin’s secretive, fast-tracked process to pick who will run new detention centers”

Josh Schnell was interviewed by Spotlight PA about the public contract law issues associated with ICE's efforts to turn Pennsylvania warehouses into detention centers. In the article, Josh stressed the importance of fairness and transparency in public contracting. Click the link to learn more.