The Court of Federal Claims holds that USAID unlawfully eliminated our client from an $800 million procurement

In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a decision requiring the U.S. Agency for International Development to allow our client–a mentor-protege joint venture–to compete for an $800 million contract.

Click here to read the Court’s decision, which includes a number of interesting findings related to suspension and debarment, joint ventures, and small business requirements.

Click here to read Law360’s coverage of the case.

Related Resources

Published on:

Cordatis files amicus brief on behalf of 13 Members of Congress

Josh Schnell and Sam Van Kopp filed an amicus brief on behalf of 13 Members of Congress (7 Senators and 6 Representatives) in support of the plaintiffs in NJ et al. v. OMB et al. (D. Mass). Plaintiffs are 21 states and the District of Columbia who are challenging the Trump administration’s termination of billions of dollars of grants and other federal financial assistance agreements. Click the link to learn more.
Published on:

“Mystery surrounds $1.2 billion Army contract to build huge detention tent camp in Texas desert”

Partner Josh Schnell was quoted in a recent AP article on the Army's award of a $1.2 billion contract to build and operate an immigration detention facility on Fort Bliss. In the article, Josh discusses some of the bid protest issues related to the contract. Click this post for a link to the article.
Published on:

Successful GAO Protest Intervention

In a recent GAO protest, a Cordatis team consisting of David Cohen, John O'Brien, and Rhina Cardenal successfully defended our client's task-order contract for telecom services from the Social Security Administration. Click the link to learn more.