The Court of Federal Claims holds that USAID unlawfully eliminated our client from an $800 million procurement

In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a decision requiring the U.S. Agency for International Development to allow our client–a mentor-protege joint venture–to compete for an $800 million contract.

Click here to read the Court’s decision, which includes a number of interesting findings related to suspension and debarment, joint ventures, and small business requirements.

Click here to read Law360’s coverage of the case.

Related Resources

Published on:

Cordatis prevails in GAO protest alleging an organizational conflict of interest

A Cordatis team consisting of David Cohen and John O'Brien successfully defended Deloitte & Touche's contract award in a bid protest claiming that the Department of Defense failed to investigate and mitigate an alleged organizational conflict of interest.
Published on:

Updated requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

Client Alert: On May 14, 2024, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released updated standards for protecting CUI. Please click the link to learn more.
Published on:

Cordatis protest win snatches victory from the jaws of defeat

A Cordatis team consisting of Daniel Strouse, Pablo Nichols, John O'Brien, Jason Moy, and Rhina Cardenal recently won a post-award protest on behalf of our client ITillity, LLC.