The Court of Federal Claims holds that USAID unlawfully eliminated our client from an $800 million procurement

In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a decision requiring the U.S. Agency for International Development to allow our client–a mentor-protege joint venture–to compete for an $800 million contract.

Click here to read the Court’s decision, which includes a number of interesting findings related to suspension and debarment, joint ventures, and small business requirements.

Click here to read Law360’s coverage of the case.

Related Resources

Published on:

Another successful protest intervention

A Cordatis team consisting of David Cohen and John O’Brien successfully defended the Department of Veterans Affairs’ decision to award a contract to Deloitte Consulting for enterprise software development services.
Published on:

Can’t win for losing?

A Cordatis team consisting of Daniel Strouse and Josh Schnell recently persuaded the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to leave their client's contract in place despite an unfavorable decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Published on:

Jason Moy teaches at the Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center at the University of Virginia

Jason Moy—a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve—recently taught government contract law at the 177th Contract Attorneys Course hosted by the Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center at the University of Virginia.