Updated requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

On May 14th, 2024, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released an updated version of NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-171, Revision 3. This publication addresses safeguarding Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) within nonfederal systems and organizations. The revision introduces several significant changes. For example, the revision consolidates certain security requirements resulting in an overall lower number of security requirements – but in effect actually creates more security requirements than in Revision 2. Second, it adds organization-defined parameters (OPDs) which allow for tailoring and flexibility of controls. But, in an effort to make things simpler, NIST added in a lot of ambiguity with these OPDs. Thankfully, NIST also released NIST SP 800-171a, Rev. 3, Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information, which will help contractors assess their security posture for CUI. It is highly recommended to review the new requirements of NIST SP 800-171, Rev. 3, while also consulting the 800-171a.

Contractors seeking more information about these changes can refer to the frequently asked questions (FAQ) section and the Change Analysis available on the NIST website.

It’s worth noting that if a contract includes DFARS Clause 252.204-7012—and every contract that involves the DoD and CUI should—contractors are required to adhere to NIST SP 800-171. According to this clause, compliance is expected with the version of NIST SP 800-171 that was in effect at the time of solicitation issuance. This could mean that new contracts are required to follow Revision 3. But, in anticipation of Revision 3, the DoD issued a class deviation—that is a change to the language in the DFARS. This deviation specifies that contractors should continue to comply with the previous version, NIST SP 800-171 Revision 2, until further notice. Further details are available in the associated Press Release.

Consequently, contractors are not immediately required to adopt the changes outlined in Revision 3. However, it’s important to recognize that Revision 3 will eventually become the standard. Therefore, contractors are advised to utilize this transition period to prepare for the eventual implementation of Revision 3. Please contact Jason Moy if you have questions or need legal assistance with these matters.

Related Resources

Published on:

Client alert: U.S. government cannot implement the overhaul of federal grant regulations through December 11, 2026

Congress has put OMB’s proposed overhaul of federal grant regulations on hold through December 11, 2026. Against the backdrop of an extraordinary public response to the proposed overhaul—496,606 comments received—our latest client alert explains how the proposed overhaul has been delayed by the 2027 Continuing Appropriations Act and what may come next.
Published on:

District court holds that agencies cannot terminate grants based on post-award changes to agency goals and priorities

The District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently held that 2 C.F.R. § 200.340(a)(4) does not authorize grant terminations based on changes to program goals or agency priorities that an agency identifies after issuing a grant. This decision is significant because the administration has relied on 2 C.F.R. § 200.340(a)(4) to terminate billions of dollars in grants based on post-award changes to program goals and priorities. Josh Schnell and Sam Van Kopp represented 13 members of Congress who filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs in the case, who are twenty states, three governors, and the District of Columbia. Click this post to read the decision and our amicus brief.
Published on:

Cordatis prevails in Federal Circuit appeal

Daniel Strouse and Josh Schnell recently obtained a favorable appellate decision in a multi-year, multi-protest saga involving USPS's global contract for bomb-detection services. Of note, the Federal Circuit's decision includes important holdings on timely interventions and the requirements for filing redacted protest pleadings. Click the link to learn more.