This section provides useful news and resources such as links to information and assistance sites for legal matters, articles published by Cohen Mohr attorneys, representative cases, and various policies and procedures relevant to our practice areas.
Uncategorized
Menu
Published on:
Orbital Sciences Corporation B-414603; B-414603.2
1. Bid protest is denied where the agency waived a solicitation requirement and the protester did not allege that it was prejudiced by the waiver. 2. Protests challenging the agency’s cost realism evaluation are denied, where...
1. Bid protest that agency waived solicitation’s page limit for awardee’s proposal is denied where record shows the agency reasonably determined that contents of past performance section of awardee’s proposal were properly exempt from the page...
1. Bid protest that agency unreasonably evaluated protester’s proposal is denied where proposed deputy program manager did not meet solicitation’s education requirements. 2. Agency’s communications with awardee concerning matters of responsibility do not constitute discussions where...
1. Protest of the evaluation of the protester’s key personnel is denied where the record shows that the evaluation was consistent with the terms of the solicitation and the agency reasonably documented the evaluation. 2. Protest...
Raytheon Company, B-414354; B-414354.2, May 10, 2017
Bid protest challenging the award of a sole-source contract is denied where the record demonstrates that the agency reasonably concluded that there was only one responsible source able to meet the agency’s requirements.
Bill Savarino saved another clearance before the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA). This one involved allegations under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) stemming from the applicant’s family ties to the African country of Tanzania. Both...
Cohen Mohr successfully protested the eligibility of a purported service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern (SDVO SBC) on the grounds that a service-disabled veteran did not control the firm at the time of offer. Victor Klingelhofer represented...
Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh: The Not-So-Bright-Line
In Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh, referred to in this article as ‘‘Sharp III,’’ the Federal Circuit, for the first time, addressed the interpretation and application of FAR 8.406-6, the 10-year-old Disputes Clause applicable to claims...
Cohen Mohr Argues Case of First Impression in Federal Circuit re: BCA Jurisdiction Under Contract Disputes Act: Sharp v. Dept. of the Army, 2012-1299 (Fed. Cir.)
On December 6, 2012, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard argument in a case of first impression regarding the interpretation and application of FAR 8.406-6, which provision determines the authority of the ordering agency...
